[OSM-legal-talk] ECJ confirmed 96/9/EG for printed maps

[Simon Poole]

Am 13.03.2016 um 12:35 schrieb Tobias Wendorff:
> I totally understand your expaination and I often used the same words
> to describe ODbL. But the OSMF should release a notification to clearly
> state the difference between other produced works (like artwork based
> on OpenStreetMap) and printed maps.
>
>
See
http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Community_Guidelines/Produced_Work_-_Guideline

Which covers what Christoph has already pointed out, I'm not sure why we
would want to differentiate between maps and other produced works as you
suggest.

Simon

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20160313/f56a2c1e/attachment.sig>