[OSM-legal-talk] Do overlays have to be released under ODbL?

[Simon Poole]

Ahem, this is going around in circles.

I specifically limited my point to the case in which there was no
changes to the OSM layer due to the 3rd party layer and vice versa.

In other words: there is no interaction between the layers other than
they are visually superimposed.

Simon

Am 13.03.2016 um 13:57 schrieb Tobias Wendorff:
> Am So, 13.03.2016, 13:50 schrieb Simon Poole:
>> Am 13.03.2016 um 13:35 schrieb Tobias Wendorff:
>>> ....but of course it interacts with the features.
>> How?
> That's exactly written in here:
> http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Community_Guidelines/Horizontal_Map_Layers_-_Guideline
>
> "For example, if there are restaurants in the OpenStreetMap layer and you
> add additional restaurants in another layer, but you include only those
> restaurants not present in the OpenStreetMap layer so that the restaurant
> layers will complement each other, then the layers for this feature are
> interacting and the restaurants added in your non-OpenStreetMap layer must
> be shared."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20160313/8e0412e2/attachment.sig>