[OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance

[Simon Poole]

Blake where is the imagery provider in question based?

Simon


Am 23.01.2017 um 22:01 schrieb Blake Girardot HOT/OSM:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
>> In any case, getting permission to distribute on ODbL terms only would
>> seem to be suboptimal and endangers any contributions based on so
>> licensed material as any license change, even in name only, would cause
>> issues that require going back to the licensor.
>>
> Simon, can you give an example of language you think would be best for this?
>
> Something like:
>
> "Specific permission is granted to use this imagery for digitizing
> data into OpenStreetMap and the resulting OpenStreetMap data to be be
> released under the OSM project's license of choice."
>
> Is that what you have in mind?
>
> Cheers,
> Blake
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Blake Girardot
> Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, TM3 Project Manager
> skype: jblakegirardot
> HOT Core Team Contact: info at hotosm.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20170123/f218dc5a/attachment.sig>