[OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] I added MAPS.ME to list of entities using OSM data illegally (without proper attribution)

Nuno Caldeira nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com
Tue Oct 8 19:39:58 UTC 2019


you understood me wrong. I meant it was a good example of compliance. it's
a fair and correct solution. don't understand why others (including OSMF
corporate members) don't do the same.

A terça, 8/10/2019, 20:37, Clifford Snow <clifford at snowandsnow.us> escreveu:

>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 11:33 AM Nuno Caldeira <
> nunocapelocaldeira at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Speaking of attribution, here's a great example by Microsoft Bing maps,
>> that has attribution based on the zoom level, they seem to be using OSM
>> buildings and HERE roads
>> https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=39.97203083116834~-8.634339&lvl=10&style=r&FORM=BMLOGO
>>
>>
>> Up until they got contacted by OSMF to fix the attribution, nothing will
>> happen and won't comply. They do not reply or give lazy excuses when a
>> contributor approaches them
>>
> Nuno I'm confused by your statement on Bing maps. The clearly attribute
> OSM when zoomed in. If they only use HERE data when zoomed out, what
> requirements do they have to attribute OSM and if so on what basis? When
> zoomed in, both HERE and OSM are attributed.
>
> OT - One of the problems I noticed using two different data sources in
> Portugal is roads intersecting buildings. I've never been to Portugal - how
> good is OSM compared to HERE? Why can't they drop HERE and just use OSM?
>
> Best,
> Clifford
>
> --
> @osm_washington
> www.snowandsnow.us
> OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20191008/d37d1df5/attachment.html>


More information about the legal-talk mailing list