[OSM-legal-talk] OSM compatibility of licenses which restrict modification

[Kathleen Lu]

At least in English,
"not reuse the Information in a way that suggests that it is official or
that Licensor approves your use of the Information;
take all reasonable steps to ensure that the uses permitted above do not
mislead others and that the Information itself is not misrepresented."
reads as a trademark clause, which has always been okay and compatible.
-Kathleen

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 8:42 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 14. Jul 2020, at 15:28, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe they assume that it is covered
> > anyway by moral rights?
> >
> > But ODBL waives moral rights if allowed
> > by law,
> > it attempts to block asserting such claims,
> > and so on.
> >
> > Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer etc
>
>
> neither am I, just wondering up to which level contradictions and
> uncertainties in licensing terms are still ok for OpenStreetMap and when
> it’s too much.
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> legal-talk mailing list
> legal-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20200714/02c7a815/attachment.htm>