[OSM-legal-talk] Changeset Comments Copyright

[Frederik Ramm]

Hi,

On 23.09.20 12:34, GITNE wrote:
> The issue is not availability of the data but Slack *republishing*
> content

Surely Slack is doing that not out of their own decision, but because
someone has instructed them (or their web service) to do so?

> (for profit) which presumably is not covered either by the ODbL

Assuming that the data is covered by ODbL, then "These rights explicitly
include commercial use, and do not exclude any field of endeavour."
(section 3.0)

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"