[OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-3.0 *IT* license

[Simon Poole]

Am 01.10.2022 um 11:15 schrieb Andrea Musuruane:
>
> Even if it was a mistake (i.e. the Licensor didn't understand the 
> License it freely chose) I believe it is legally irrelevant. And if we 
> want to pursue this, we should then check that all Licensors have read 
> and understood the License they spontaneously chose (and that they 
> also understood the waivers).
>
I hope it was clear that I was suggesting taking the good form, moral 
high ground stance which has little to do with legality. What is the 
problem with taking the small effort to verify that data sources are OK 
with us using their data, not only, but particularly because we are 
interested in long term beneficial relationships.

Simon

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20221001/0e7cbf4c/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/attachments/20221001/0e7cbf4c/attachment.sig>