[OSM-legal-talk] OpenStreetMap Share Alike Produced Work issue
Paul Norman
penorman at mac.com
Mon May 29 23:50:35 UTC 2023
On 2023-05-28 11:32 p.m., Esin Ekizoglu wrote:
> I have a question about this work. Normally, from what I have read
> (Openstreetmap Licence), my productions belong to the status of
> "produced work". (because I analyze public GPS tracks by integrating
> other given data (like bike paths plans for future for example) not
> only from Openstreetmap but other open sources (with a work QGIS) The
> results are in the form of images (jpeg or png exported from QGIS) and
> relate to part of the publication. Is correctly referencing
> Openstreetmap and Contributors will be sufficient for the questions of
> the copyright?
> Another question: I saw that before ODbL there was CC BY-SA 2.0 until
> September 2012. Can't traces downloaded before this date be part of
> produced work? On the site it is marked as if the whole database was
> under the ODbL license. Does it refer to public gps data before
> September 2012? I will have to delete these traces of my research work
> since I cannot communicate them with the same license?
Images produced from OSM data prior to the license change must be
licensed as CC BY-SA 2.0 or later. For ODbL data, see
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#1.8.2._Books,_magazines_and_printed_maps.
Your book, as a whole, can be whatever license you like.
More information about the legal-talk
mailing list