[Local-chapters] what chapters and OSMF can do for each other

[Emilie Laffray]

+1
On 16 Jan 2013 15:51, "Daniel Kastl" <daniel at georepublic.de> wrote:

>
>
>>  So my suggestion would be to have very light local chapter approach:
>>  - If someone wants to call their group as OSM local chapter, let them do
>> it without much hard rules. Rules to follow would be same as normal
>> contributors (do not copy data etc), act in good faith etc. No much formal
>> obligations, fees etc.
>>  - If some local chapter spoils something really hard, then OSMF can
>> expell them.
>>  - if there are competing chapters which want same thing (like local
>> domain name), then discuss them case by case.
>>
>
> +1
>
> I agree totally with Jaak ... keep it simple. Once it involves financials
> it gets comlicated. A lot of questions I mentioned before came up during
> IRC chats, but they came more from OSMF than form local chapters.
> So personally I think the local chapter issue is an easy one to solve, but
> the OSMF has to make the final decision, not the local chapters. And
> probably it never became part of the agenda of a board meeting.
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> --
> Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
> eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
> Web: http://georepublic.de
> _______________________________________________
> Local-chapters mailing list
> Local-chapters at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/local-chapters
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/local-chapters/attachments/20130116/a20e9870/attachment.html>