[OSM-newbies] Creating a cul-de-sac
Robert Funnell
robert.funnell at mcgill.ca
Thu Jul 31 11:48:01 BST 2008
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Oliver Lewis wrote:
> If there's a large loop at the end, #2 seems correct, but without the
> junction=roundabout. If it's a small area at the end of the road that allows
> cars to turn, put a single node at the end and tag it
> highway=turning_circle.
> see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle
>
> noexit is not necessary, as routing software can figure this out. it's also
> unclear what it means / how to tag if there's a pedestrian or cycle through
> route but it's a cul-de-sac for cars.
Bernd is using the presence of noexit=yes in a consistency check for
accidentally unconnected ways:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2008-June/010645.html
I don't know how widely accepted this usage is. It seems that the
graphical representation of it would conflict with the graphical
representation of a turning circle. Perhaps the two should be mutually
exclusive, and the unconnected-ways check should include a check for
the presence of a turning circle. Presumably the check automatically
accounts for the presence of an explicit loop.
- Robert
More information about the newbies
mailing list