[OSM-newbies] Paths and Footways
Trevor Hook
t_k_hook at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Jul 15 07:46:34 BST 2009
Hi Folks
I'm trying to get clear in my head the difference between footway and a
path.
I would have thought that a footway would be a cut through between
residential streets, paved paths through parks, maybe designated paths
next to major roads - distinctly urban in nature. While a path would
tend to be a unpaved route (although not always) through fields and
moors and mountains - largely rural in nature.
However, I've noticed that nearly all the paths out in the countryside
seem to be tagged as footways not paths.
For example, http://osm.org/go/eu626g_3j--
In the linked location, there is a Footway coming in from the northwest,
my Path coming in from the west, a bridge and a Footway leading to the east.
The Footway from the northwest is a dirt track running through the same
field as my Path coming from the West, to my mind the Northwest Footway
should be a Path, the Footway leading east from the bridge is a footway
because it's a paved route through a recreation park leading towards
Godmanchester.
Is this tagging of anything that takes pedestrians as a footway a
convention I should be following or is my own definition of the
difference between footway and path right and I should be tag as
appropriate?
Thanks
Trevor
More information about the newbies
mailing list