[OSM-newbies] Stepping stones?
ael
law_ence.dev at ntlworld.com
Sun Jul 26 12:57:47 BST 2009
Tyler wrote:
> My suggestion is to map the rocks individually if they're large enough,
> otherwise it's just a foot crossing, right?
> highway=pathfoot=yes/designated
Thanks for the suggestion, but this is much smaller scale. The river is
only about 3 metres wide here, and the blocks are too small to mark
individually. The crossing certainly isn't designated. Nevertheless this
is a significant crossing because it is the only way to cross onto a
largish "island", between two branches of a river. The other branch is
rather bigger.
I want to mark this accurately with disabled users in mind. If it is
just marked as a footway (pathfoot was a typo?) then someone in a wheel
chair, for example, has no chance. Even an ordinary walker will want to
be warned that appropriate clothing and shoes are needed.
As far as I can see, we don't have a tag for this sort of thing. A new
tag, "stepping_stones" seems like an obvious choice?
ael
>> I have just mapped a place where substantial blocks have been laid in a
>> river to form stepping stones. For the moment, I have tagged this as
>> highway=ford. I found that on the wiki, but not stepping_stones.
[...]
>> I don't feel comfortable with "ford": no sort of vehicle could cross.
>> Even a bicycle would present great problems. I suppose that I could
>> qualify with things like bicycle=no. It probably needs "water=low" as
More information about the newbies
mailing list