[OSM-newbies] Overkill or Not?

[Rich Milburn]

Hi,

Thanks for the advice.

You're absolutely right, looking at it again, the SB-WB flyover bridge tagged section is much too long, from memory the elevated part starts roughly as the road turns due south, it has been a while since I drove that particular section.

Will also look into re-tagging the flyovers, this was the first complex junction I did, so there are bound to be some errors.


 

Rich.

 
> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:36:17 -0400
> From: richard at weait.com
> To: newbies at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-newbies] Overkill or Not?
> 
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Rich Milburn <richmilburn at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > IMHO, not overkill.
> > Here's one I did :)
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=18.7655295431614&lon=99.0305283665657&zoom=17
> 
> Nice junction, Rich. Your situation is a little different as you are
> looking at junctions with flyovers, while Austin was looking at
> grade-level junction.
> 
> I would also recommend using tertiary_link, etc, for the flyovers in
> your junction. Perhaps also consider splitting some of the flyovers
> and designating bridge=yes, only for the portion that is a bridge. (I
> don't see aerial imagery but imagine that the SB to WB bridge might be
> shorter than you show).
> 
> Have fun!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> newbies mailing list
> newbies at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Access your other email accounts and manage all your email from one place.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/167688463/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/newbies/attachments/20091004/39c997a5/attachment.html>