[OSM-newbies] proscriptive rudeness on newbies list to be discouraged

[Paul Johnson]

On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 17:26 -0400, Bill Ricker wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Paul Johnson <baloo-PVOPTusIyP/srOwW+9ziJQ at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > No, no it's not.  By failing to split the original digest into original
> > messages before replying, you destroy the In-Reply-To: references
> > header.  This breaks threads.
> 
> having Subjects is better than nothing. It is possible to follow the
> logical thread with subject sort or next by subject in most tool-sets.

Really?  Microsoft Outlook does this, but everything else including
gmail does it the right way.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/newbies/attachments/20090914/752f9d48/attachment.pgp>