[OSM-newbies] Nodes v. Ways when adding amenities
Tac Tacelosky
tacman at gmail.com
Thu May 9 14:18:57 UTC 2013
"A circle would imply a circular building."
Only if it were tagged with building, right? Suppose it was only tagged
with non-physical attributes, like shop=grocery? Would square be any
better / worse?
On a related note, when creating ways for businesses, my gut feeling is to
surround the entire property, not just the building. This is especially
relevant for gas stations, where the building itself is often tiny, and for
that matter the building is often a convenience shop with sells candy and
maps, and will take your cash if you didn't pay at the pump. But the "gas
station" to me seems like the whole property.
Tac
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Mike Thompson <miketho16 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Maybe it'd be better to add these unknown shapes as circles? Then it
> would be obvious that this is a just a big node with some relative size
> information?
>
> A circle would imply a circular building. If the building isn't circular,
> I don't think it should be represented in the data that way.
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Tac Tacelosky <tacman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Better no outline than an inaccurate one. Hmm. How about if there were
>> a tag to indicate that the outline is an estimate and needs further review?
>>
>>
>> I recently added a new grocery store that opened in my neighborhood:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/807746578
>>
>> It's a mid-sized store, and takes up most of the building on that corner,
>> it replaced the Safeway that used to be there, which is reflected in that
>> building's history:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/66834804
>>
>> I'd like to associate the new market with the building. Should I simply
>> name the building and add the tag shop=supermarket?
>>
>> Even with great aerial photography, it's often difficult to determine
>> where one store ends. DC is fortunate to have the footprints of many of
>> our buildings in OSM because the data was made available. But I'm working
>> on a section in New Jersey now where there is no data beyond the TIGER
>> import. I have geocoded photos (that I took) of a few dozen shops, and I'd
>> like add them to OSM, but it feels like adding them as a bunch of points
>> (nodes) will be worse than looking at the size of the storefront and
>> drawing a series of little boxes that reflect the relative sizes. I don't
>> have building information at all, so I don't know the address.
>>
>> Maybe it'd be better to add these unknown shapes as circles? Then it
>> would be obvious that this is a just a big node with some relative size
>> information?
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestions.
>>
>> Tac
>>
>> Tac
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Dave F. <davefox at madasafish.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/05/2013 11:42, Tac Tacelosky wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm about to add a few shops in a shopping center. Is it better to add
>>>> them as ways so that the renderer has some idea about the footprint and
>>>> relative size? Or as nodes, which seems to be the more common approach?
>>>>
>>>> The tiny nail salon is right next to a large supermarket, and the gas
>>>> station on the corner is in between those two as far as size, while I can't
>>>> do an exact outline, I can draw a box to indicate relative sizes.
>>>>
>>>> Are both approaches correct, or is one way better?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Both are correct. It depends on you really; whether you have the time or
>>> patience to draw a full outline or simply add a node. Many areas now have
>>> fairly accurate aerial imagery that can be traced. As renderers are
>>> allowing greater zoom levels I've been upgrading POI's to polygon areas. A
>>> problem you may run into however is multi-storey shopping centres. There's
>>> never been a satisfactory way to map/render these as area & you may want to
>>> keep them as POI's.
>>>
>>> Dave F.
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> newbies mailing list
>> newbies at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> newbies mailing list
> newbies at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/newbies/attachments/20130509/b5e063d4/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the newbies
mailing list