[Osmf-talk] New license change proposal status
Klaus Gaßner
k_gassner at web.de
Sat Oct 17 12:12:53 UTC 2009
Hi!
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
> In fact, since you are asking us members "do you approve moving to
> ODbL", should you not declare *how* this move is planned to proceed,
> including very sensitive bits like the wording of the message sent to
> all contributors, and what you intend to do about data not re-licensed?
> After all someone might say: I approve of the move to ODbL if it is done
> this way, but if they're planning to do it that way then I don't?
>
> Asking us to say yes to a completely unspecified process seems to be
> asking a lot. You could be sending out SWAT teams to hold a gun against
> the head of anyone not relicensing their data and claim that the process
> was authorised by the OSMF membership ;-)
Frederik has a very important point there. There was a lot of discussion
about the licence change earlier this year and as I percieved it, the
main concerns and objections were not about the license itself. They
were about a rushed approach rather than a reasonable and fair procedure
to explain about the change and collect the agreements.
So I agree that laying down a well thought out procedure beforehand is
not only an important point - it may also be the decisive point for many
people.
bye
Klaus
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list