[Osmf-talk] Membership applications from Skobbler employees

Milo van der Linden milo at dogodigi.net
Wed Aug 24 10:51:37 UTC 2011

At OSGEO, they have some sort of membership pyramid

It is my opinion that the "flow"

participant -> member -> charter member -> board

prevents hostile take overs and provides a perfectly fit
infrastructure to keep everyone on board and happy.

Dear board, please read the members area at OSGEO and use it as
reference for the OSMF.

2011/8/24, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org>:
> Hi,
> On 08/24/2011 08:51 AM, Steve Coast wrote:
>> I think you have to look at this in the context of the last time a
>> company paid for its employees to become members. It was not received
>> well.
> I remember vaguely.
> As I said previously, there's nothing in the current rules that forbids
> this kind of mass joining but at the same time there is a provision that
> the board has to accept membership applications so they are within their
> right if they don't; one could even say: If the current rules say that
> membership applications have to be accepted by the board then that
> implies that they must act with a certain diligence - otherwise, why
> would the rules involve the board at all?
> To all those who strongly criticize the current board action - try to
> put yourself into their situation. If they had simply rubber-stamped the
> membership applications and someone dug that out later, after the
> election - would that not have caused an equal number of complaints?
> I think we should use this as an example to help us shape the new AoA so
> that they explicitly say what is ok and what isn't. - Maybe that was the
> intention in the first place ;)
> Bye
> Frederik
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk

Milo van der Linden
Open Source Geospatial consultant

do go digi - *Geospatial solutions*

Beukenlaan 2
5261LE  Vught

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list