[Osmf-talk] should OSMF AGM include time for discussion debate?
derricknehrenberg at gmail.com
Mon Sep 12 19:02:47 UTC 2011
Indeed. I was alluding to discussions/debates over contentious issues...
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Nic Roets <nroets at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:01 PM, derrick nehrenberg
> > <derricknehrenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Next year, would it be helpful to use OSMF-talk to distill and
> >> a discussion/debate agenda scheduled for the next AGM?
> > Not as far as I am concerned. Looking at the track record, associations
> > / or manifesto of a candidate is more than enough information for me.
> I presume that Derrick was referring to discussions of topics other
> than the board vote. The vote portion of the AGM is a relatively
> small portion of the time taken by the AGM this year.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk