[Osmf-talk] should OSMF AGM include time for discussion debate?

derrick nehrenberg derricknehrenberg at gmail.com
Mon Sep 12 19:02:47 UTC 2011

Indeed.  I was alluding to discussions/debates over contentious issues...

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Nic Roets <nroets at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:01 PM, derrick nehrenberg
> > <derricknehrenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Next year, would it be helpful to use OSMF-talk to distill and
> communicate
> >> a discussion/debate agenda scheduled for the next AGM?
> >
> > Not as far as I am concerned. Looking at the track record, associations
> and
> > / or manifesto of a candidate is more than enough information for me.
> I presume that Derrick was referring to discussions of topics other
> than the board vote.  The vote portion of the AGM is a relatively
> small portion of the time taken by the AGM this year.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20110912/c9193c83/attachment.html>

More information about the osmf-talk mailing list