[Osmf-talk] OSMF Articles of Association - Discussion on Revision for 2013 AGM

Rich richlv at nakts.net
Fri Apr 19 07:32:44 UTC 2013


On 04/19/2013 01:35 AM, Steve Coast wrote:
> Personally, for privacy reasons I disagree. My belief is that opt outs
> should exist in some way, for at least some data. For example, employees
> at major map companies may wish to keep their membership private from
> their employer.

i don't think i would renew my membership if real name policy would be 
enforced. not that i'm terribly anonymous, but i'd still prefer to keep 
some level of abstraction.

> Steve
>
>
> On Apr 18, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Alex Barth <alex at mapbox.com
> <mailto:alex at mapbox.com>> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org
>> <mailto:frederik at remote.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     I am *very* much in favour of making the current list of members
>>     (of any membership class) available to all members *without* an
>>     opt-out option; the list containing at least the full real name
>>     but ideally also the E-Mail address.
>>
>>
>> +1
-- 
  Rich




More information about the osmf-talk mailing list