[Osmf-talk] members addresses

Simon Poole simon at osmfoundation.org
Thu Mar 7 10:11:06 UTC 2013


Am 07.03.2013 08:26, schrieb Dudley Ibbett:
> Does the proposal actually get around this requirement?  I.e. it would seem to go against the act.
The members of the additional member class would not be members as
defined in the companies act, their rights and obligations would be
defined solely in the AoA.

Simon




More information about the osmf-talk mailing list