[Osmf-talk] hosting in the UK and "anti-terror legislation"
dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Sep 9 12:33:26 UTC 2013
2013/9/9 Jonathan Bennett <jonobennett at gmail.com>
> Just to clarify, when we talk about "privacy" in OSM terms, I assume we
> mean "the inability to link an OSM identity to a real-world identity
> when that person doesn't wish that to happen"?
> Every *activity* by an OSM user is necessarily public, so there's no
> privacy there, and nor should there be. Unless I'm missing something?
yes, I intended privacy for an individual user not being identified as a
real world person. FWIW this is also a human right...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk