[Osmf-talk] Where the ODbL Ends and the Community Guidelines Begin
danstowell at gmail.com
Wed Aug 6 16:42:17 UTC 2014
This is very healthy! Congrats to the LWG for working away at this!
I have just one tiny piece of feedback. The example on the
"Substantial" guideline says "[...] You do not include any building
outlines as there are lots." This sentence is unclear - it could
either mean (a) in this hypothetical example, the user decides not to
include building outlines; or (b) the user in general doesn't need to
count features which there are lots of! I think (a) is probably what
you mean. If I'm right, I'd suggest rephrasing to "Suppose you decide
not to include the 270 building outlines."
2014-08-06 17:16 GMT+01:00 Harry Wood <mail at harrywood.co.uk>:
> Blog post from LWG:
> "The Licensing Working Group (LWG) has been working hard to ensure that uncertainty is reduced for data users while the intent of the community is protected. After much discussion, in June this year the first set of guidelines was approved"
> Check out the blog post for details and links to these guidelines, and ideas for new guidelines which LWG are still working on. Big thanks to LWG for all their hard work on producing these.
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
More information about the osmf-talk