[Osmf-talk] ballot results unofficial
severin.menard at gmail.com
Mon Dec 8 21:44:02 UTC 2014
My apologies for not having voted, as it was really my intention but I just
did not put the deadline on my agenda, followed main of the exchanges and
appreciated the explanations provided by some about the choices at stake,
had a busy week, had in mind to definitely check the deadline at the end of
the week... but it was too late.
Clearly it is my mistake, I should have dedicated one single minute to
check the date and definitely will do it next time. It is not related about
the fact the discussions are quite antagonistic sometimes; it may be
regretful, personal attacks never solve anything but well, it is in the
human nature to have opposed opinions on topics people are really engaged
Maybe next time send reminders at eg D-2 and D-1 in caps to attract the eye
among many threads on the list, or having a purely official, informing
channel and one another for the passionate discussions?
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Marc Zoutendijk <marczoutendijk at mac.com>
> Dear List,
> Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> > 110 valid votes were registered
> Nearly 2,000,000 registered users
> of which
> nearly 500,000 are active mappers
> and only
> 600 are a member of the OSMF 
> and only
> 110 of those members found it necessary to vote!
> What was all that fuzz about the last months?
> When I discovered OSM and started to contribute as mapper, I thought it
> would be good/necessary/helpful to also become a member of the foundation
> as well. So I did. Shocking to realize that never in my life I became a
> member of such a painful minority.
> We have a long way to go to improve support for OSMF by increasing
> membership numbers.
> The statistics are based on
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk