[Osmf-talk] Articles of Association Update 2.0

[Oleksiy Muzalyev]

I think it is a good idea. Completely public vote, in general, may be 
influenced by a social inertia 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_inertia , a status quo bias 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_quo_bias , etc.

Remote is a good idea. But as in any endeavor, - forewarned is forearmed.

brgds
O.

On 24.07.2014 10:49, Jaak Laineste (Nutiteq) wrote:
> By the way, the key technical solution to avoid “compromised enduser 
> computer” issue implemented in Estonia was not to make votes 
> completely public, but to provide another channel (Android app in this 
> case) which enables to check your own vote privately.
>