[Osmf-talk] Articles of Association Update 2.0

[Dan Stowell]

Sounds good to me. It adds a small barrier-to-entry (compared against
plaintext-email-with-reply) but my gut response is that it's OK and
worth it.

Best
Dan

2014-07-24 12:07 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch>:
> The "low tech" solution to this is simply to require anybody who wants
> to participate in an e-mail vote to supply a public key to the OSMF when
> they signup, and to required the votes to be signed. IMHO that would be
> sufficient enough for me to be "the electronic voting system".
>
> Simon
>
> Am 24.07.2014 12:51, schrieb Dan S:
> ...
>>
>> I'm generally happy with the lo-fi vote-by-email approach, as long as
>> the OSMF thinks they can run it practically. Someone pointed out that
>> email spoofing is an easy way to break an election. Would this be
>> fixed if all vote emails received a reply to confirm? Would that be
>> practical?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>



-- 
http://www.mcld.co.uk