[Osmf-talk] DWG survey on organized editing

Stefan Keller sfkeller at gmail.com
Mon Oct 2 18:22:59 UTC 2017


I see you are defending the survey bravely ;-)
I just remember e.g. choices something like "requires documented
instructions" (-1) and "requires full real name" (-2).
On the other hand, I can't remember a choices like "put disclaimer as
comment or hashtags"...

:Stefan

2017-10-02 20:05 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann <chris_hormann at gmx.de>:
> On Monday 02 October 2017, Stefan Keller wrote:
>>
>> Frederik asked to express what I meant by bias. But since the survey
>> is closed (for me) it's difficult to cite the questions. So let me
>> try to exemplify like this: An unbiased survey about the pros and
>> cons of something (organized mapping in this case) would be like this
>> +1, 0, -1, therefore having an affirmative, a neutral and a declining
>> statement. A biased survey would ask questions like this 0, -1, -2.
>
> I think all questions are completely neutral in that regard, most
> allowed you to answer somewhere between 'completely agree'
> and 'completely disagree' *and* 'no answer'.
>
> --
> Christoph Hormann
> http://www.imagico.de/
>
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk



More information about the osmf-talk mailing list