[Osmf-talk] DWG survey on organized editing
chris_hormann at gmx.de
Tue Oct 3 08:40:58 UTC 2017
On Tuesday 03 October 2017, Robert Banick wrote:
> I’m not actually opposed to a policy. It’s an idea grounded in the
> reality of some bad practices we need to sort out. But as Helge
> points out, there is no accompanying welcome mat and I find that
> disturbing. And as Darafei points out past policies have in effect
> greatly discouraged many types of editing by privileging the most
> reactionary elements of our community with the most time on their
> hands to be vocal.
I think you can be sure that many in the OSM community are aware of the
shortcomings of existing regulations and will look hard at whatever the
DWG is going to propose to make sure to to repeat past mistakes.
More information about the osmf-talk