[Osmf-talk] Membership Fee Waiver Program

[Oleksiy Muzalyev]

On 23.09.17 14:54, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23.09.2017 14:46, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
>> I think it is a good idea to include the number of changesets into the
>> equation.
> *If* one wants to look at edit activity (which is already difficult
> because one would have to implement OAuth in the signup form to ensure
> the person actually is the owner of the OSM account they claim to use)
> then I think we should only say "someone what has shown a dedication to
> improving OSM through their edits" or something like that, and leave
> details to MWG's discretion, because otherwise things can easily be
> played. As you know, some people make 2 edits per changeset and others
> 2000. Some people make few but very valuable edits that took a lot of on
> the ground research, others make a thousand edits by importing a shape
> file. You don't want to reject one and accept the other.
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
It is true. Good point.

brgds

O.