[Osmf-talk] Board decision on recent OSMF membership registrations
kate at maploser.com
Sat Nov 24 20:52:27 UTC 2018
Perhaps that last paragraph from the board was not clear. The members being
discussed are not eligible to vote this year as they did not meet the
deadline as stated here: "In years past this has been interpreted as the
start of the day 30 days prior to the meeting, according to the timezone in
CiviCRM. This is how OSMF will proceed this year, meaning eligible voters
need to be signed up prior to November 15."
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 12:50 PM Rihards <richlv at nakts.net> wrote:
> On 24.11.18 22:41, Rihards wrote:
> > On 24.11.18 22:08, Heather Leson wrote:
> >> Hi Christoph thank you for your questions. The board really spent much
> >> time discussing. Comments inline.
> >> Heather
> > ...
> >> > > There had been a mass sign-up of 100 new accounts on 15.11.2018
> >> > > from India, most coming from one single IP address from a
> >> > > "well known" to OpenStreetMap. There had been a larger amount of
> >> > > complaints regarding edits from that company, who provide
> >> > > services" to other companies.
> >> What is the reason for not disclosing the name of the company?
> >> Since it
> >> apparently was identified without any help of them i see no problem
> >> with disclosing that. Apart from that who did identify said
> >> The important factor is that 100 members joined from India, a country
> >> with 1 BILLION people. This is exciting and I welcome them to be fully
> >> engaged and meet the community. I hope that they can get to know each of
> >> you and be part of the the community going forward.
> >> Members are members. I don't think that we should focus on where they
> >> work. I am not personally defined by my workplace.
> > Heather, I would disagree that the important factor is ratio of new
> > members against the population of their home country, and I would also
> > disagree that employee should be ignored.
> > Especially so when the registrations happen 4 days before the voting
> > deadline, on the same day.
> > What I consider important is that this is a 14.5% increase in OSMF
> > vote-eligible membership.
> ...likely messed up the calculations and the increase is 9.7%.
> Our election turnout last year seems to be 63% -
> https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Annual_General_Meetings/2017/Minutes .
> > As an individual mapper I find this highly worrying, and I find
> > concentrating on the country population dishonest.
> >  Based on the latest value from
> > https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Membership/Statistics
> > ...
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the osmf-talk