[Osmf-talk] Closed board meeting again
Simon Poole
simon at poole.ch
Tue Apr 23 11:20:45 UTC 2019
I've pointed this out before, but anyway: the most effective way to
counteract any takeover attempts is to simply have more members (I would
say more members that are actively involved in contributing, but I know
some will disagree with that).
Making things more complicated will tend to make it easier to game the
system. Just think about the concept of only allowing a percentage of
the existing member base as new members per year, or systems similar to
HOT membership, which once subverted work against undoing it.
See
https://opensource.com/open-organization/17/2/phipps-gaming-the-system?sc_cid=701600000011jJkAAI
(which applies to some other areas of OSM too).
SImon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20190423/86a60ebe/attachment.sig>
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list