[Osmf-talk] Board statement - Membership Working Group report on unusual signups before OSMF election
richlv at nakts.net
Thu Jan 31 16:58:02 UTC 2019
On 31.01.19 14:05, Guillaume Rischard wrote:
>> On 30 Jan 2019, at 23:34, Mikel Maron <mikel.maron at gmail.com
>> <mailto:mikel.maron at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > Why wasn't the report published by the board itself?
>> Because the MWG imposed a deadline. We were about to publish.
>> I personally think it's bad governance to have a WGs setting OSMF
>> timelines without coordination with the Board.
> /Of course/ we coordinated with the board. We sent the report to the
> board in the first place. We delayed our release date repeatedly to suit
> the board, and were constantly running after the board to get feedback.
> In the interest of transparency, if there is a request, I would be happy
> to publish the relevant board-mwg email correspondance.
> The last delay request one hour before midnight was unjustified and
> unreasonable. The board had known about that date for 12 days. It was
> clearly in the members’ interest to publish.
> It took us a month to write it, should it take you a month to read it?
I fully support MWG actions on this.
What I read as an attempt to censor this report has made me support
"weak board" position more.
Massive thank you Stereo, SJFriedl for noticing this and the detailed
 Word "awesome" used here close to its original meaning, not the one
popular in the USA.
More information about the osmf-talk