[Osmf-talk] Commitment to open communication channels

[Heather Leson]

Great. I guess I ask because the people responding are long time OSM
members. I value you, truly. Honest.

But here we are- a small circle talking on this mailing list. Maybe open is
not just the platform but the ways we work to collaborate and communicate
across gender, region and power.

Again, I get the open platform focus. In an ideal world where we all engage
with the same interent access and communications methods, this works.
However, I am asking "does this limit our ability to be a truly inclusive
equitable global community"?  Not an easy question, but I guess I would
like to hear from other community voices.

Thank you,

Heather

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020, 19:14 Martin Koppenhoefer, <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 17. Aug 2020, at 18:39, Andy Townsend <ajt1047 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > That's pretty much how I've been interpreting it - things that people
> "really ought to be able to read" will be written somewhere that's public,
> rather than a private channel from which content might disappear at any
> time (like Facebook, etc.).
>
>
> or services which some might prefer to not use because they don’t want
> their accesses traced, like google documents.
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20200817/a9b4d9c4/attachment.htm>