[Osmf-talk] Possible AoA Amendment #2: Your boss can't force you to vote a certain way

[Yves]

Nice piece!
Yves 

Le 27 octobre 2020 10:57:51 GMT+01:00, Andy Allan <gravitystorm at gmail.com> a écrit :
>On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 at 22:51, Mikel Maron <mikel.maron at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >  So far we have one side saying we need to amend the AoA, and the other side (consisting, I note, of prominent employees of large corporations) saying that it's all fine, or it's too late, or we should have done it differently but let's run this coming election as-is. This doesn't fill me with confidence.
>>
>> That's not even accurate about the "sides". Nor about what I am saying, for one. This kind of suspicion is exactly the thing I'm worried about will gain steam with this hastily developed proposal. Sucks to see me and others painted this way.
>
>I don't want to cast aspersions about your personal integrity, or
>motivations, or anything like that. Same for Mike. I've known you both
>for too long, and too well, for that. But when we ask people who have
>chosen to work for large corporations about the risks and behaviour of
>large corporations, then your viewpoints are, necessarily, coloured by
>your own positive personal experiences. The analogy of asking fish
>what they think about the water springs to mind.
>
>When all the animals in the forest get together for their annual
>garden tea party, the elephants are of course invited too. They are
>all nice elephants, they are wise and they are kind and they all mean
>well. But a small mistake, a stumble or some over-enthusiastic teenage
>elephant can lead to disaster for the whole event. And the elephants
>are all nice, and honourable, and think well of themselves, but of
>course the other animals are aware of the risks of having the
>elephants at the party.
>
>In fact, this analogy starts to break down when you consider the
>actual sizes of the organisations involved, compared to the size of
>the OSMF. Instead of 'all the animals in the forest' and a few
>elephants, please imagine a solidary rabbit holding a garden party
>alone on the savannah, with a tiny little rabbit-sized teacup in one
>paw and a tiny little rabbit sized scone with cream and jam in the
>other. This is the OSMF.
>
>In front of the rabbit is an elephant. It's a nice and kindly elephant
>but it towers over the rabbit. And this elephant is just one of a row
>of ten elephants standing side-by-side. Each of those ten elephants
>has 9 elephants in a line behind it, making a square of 100 elephants.
>And there are three of these squares, and another 32 elephants
>bringing up the rear. This is the size of the Facebook herd. The
>Microsoft herd is even bigger: it has 6 squares of a hundred
>elephants, and 74 more elephants besides. The Apple herd has 8 of
>these squares, and another 59 elephants besides.
>
>Now in each of these three herds, very few elephants have even heard
>about the rabbit, and even fewer have any interest in the rabbit's
>tiny little garden party. They have much more important things to be
>getting on with. But again, even if we assume that every elephant in
>every herd is entirely wise, generous, and acts kindly towards the
>rabbit, just one small mistake or stumble and there will be a squelch
>and one distraught elephant will have a tiny little bit of strawberry
>jam on its foot.
>
>Like it or not, elephant herds trample around, and corporations do
>too. And if we lie down on the ground with our chins on the grass
>beside our rabbit, and look up from its perspective to see all those
>elephants, and the other herds besides, we would forgive the rabbit
>for being just a tad nervous about the scones, and a tad wary when the
>elephants suggest delay.
>
>Thanks,
>Andy
>
>[1] For this analogy, the rabbit is a European rabbit of 1.6kg, and
>the elephants are 6000kg African elephants. Average sizes from
>wikipedia.
>The sizes of the three companies mentioned are based on their market
>capitalisation: FB $810bn, MS $1645bn, A $1984bn. All are major
>corporate sponsors of OSMF, conference speakers, have production
>products using OSM data, or all three.
>A comparable financial size for the OSMF is hard to determine, but I
>have used $650k USD as the sum of cash on hand in the 2018 financial
>report. However, the cost to gain 51% of members' votes is
>approximately $14k USD, so if you prefer to use that figure, the
>elephant herds are around 46x bigger than described above. Sticking
>with the $650k USD value, we have a conversion of $1m USD to around
>2.46kg
>
>_______________________________________________
>osmf-talk mailing list
>osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20201027/4190292b/attachment.htm>