[Osmf-talk] Possible AoA Amendment #2: Your boss can't force you to vote a certain way
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu Oct 29 07:03:00 UTC 2020
Oct 29, 2020, 02:43 by mike at teczno.com:
> Thanks for rolling with the animal metaphor, Andy. :)
>
> I’ll cut your mail here since it’s all available in the list archives, and respond briefly.
>
> The metaphor of OSM as a garden tea party emphasizes the speculative, volunteer nature of the project in its Isle of Wight days. The map hasn’t been a garden party for some time now.
>
Yes, corporate involvement caused already significant damage. But I think that I would not
go so far, situation is not so bad (at least in areas where I am involved in OSM)
> It has been emerging as critical infrastructure for a variety of needs
>
This does not make it more resilient to damage by companies (both intentional and
completely unintentional).
Though makes it more important to avoid damage and destruction.
> Like a postal service, it is in the nature of OSM for it to have the best coverage and widest service when there is just one. When the elephants make bigger demands with their larger parcels, the right response for a service is to accommodate them.
>
OK, now I am lost in an analogy. What would be an equivalent thing in OSM that is
- required solely by large companies (not required by other entities)
- not provided or in danger of disappearing
- can be provided by OSMF or OSM community in general
- should be provided to large companies by OSMF (or OSM community in general)
?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20201029/24ce92a4/attachment.htm>
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list