[Osmf-talk] Draft Attribution Guidelines, possible vote at end of this month & new guidelines.

Simon Poole simon at poole.ch
Fri Jun 25 08:16:56 UTC 2021


Am 25.06.2021 um 09:04 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via osmf-talk:
> ..
> (2) are you claiming that waiving explicitly required attribution for 
> some uses can be done
> just because someone considers it as an oversight?

To point out the obvious: despite you continuing to use this as a 
rhetorical tool to drum up support, nobody has ever suggested that 
attribution should be waived outside of the cases already covered by the 
licence (insubstantial extracts).

SImon


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20210625/f6fe0203/attachment.sig>


More information about the osmf-talk mailing list