[Osmf-talk] Draft resolution on membership prerequisites

[EMREOYUN]

In my opinion, 42 days/year of edit requirement should stay both normal 
and paid memberships. It will provide more security, control of members, 
and a safe place.

My suggestion is to increase this number. For me, 42 days can be reached 
too easily and anyone who wants to damage this community can easily 
bypass it. It should be, at least, 60 days of contribution per year, 
meaning 1/6 of the year of editing. It shouldn't be a problem for active 
editors of OSM and way to better than 42 days.

On 2/13/22, Tobias Knerr <osm at tobias-knerr.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> at the 2020 AGM, a 79% majority of the membership asked the board to
> propose prerequisites for membership in the OSM Foundation which would
> ensure that all applicants for membership have made a reasonable amount
> of contributions to OSM (not necessarily through mapping).[1]
> 
> We would like to ask for your feedback to a first draft of this 
> proposal
> which you can read below. It uses a definition for "reasonable amount 
> of
> contributions" that is comparable to the active contributor
> membership[2], but has lower requirements: 42 days of contributions 
> ever
> instead of 42 days per year. Existing memberships would not be affected
> by this change.
> 
> The 2020 resolution called for a membership vote on this topic in 2021.
> Unfortunately, the board didn't produce a proposal in time for the 2021
> AGM and we would like to apologize for this delay. Our current plan is
> to have the resolution ready for a general meeting on April 30, 2022.
> 
> 
> # Potential text of the resolution
> 
> Using its powers under §15 of the Articles of Association, the board of
> directors shall reject applications for membership or associate
> membership if the applicant has not demonstrably contributed to
> OpenStreetMap on at least 42 days. The specific form of the
> contributions (e.g. mapping vs. non-mapping) does not make a difference
> for the fulfilment of these prerequisites. The board may delegate
> verification and rejection of membership applications to a working 
> group.
> 
> ## Rationale:
> 
> This change would more firmly establish the OSMF as an entity serving
> the people and communities who create OpenStreetMap. By ensuring that
> votes in Foundation elections and resolutions are cast by OpenStreetMap
> contributors, it becomes more likely that the Foundation will continue
> to support the the project well.
> 
> The criteria take inspiration from the fee waiver (known as active
> contributor membership) to allow using a similar implementation. Unlike
> the fee waiver, eligibility will be evaluated as a one-time step during
> application for membership, rather than annually. As such, members do
> not have to fear losing their membership if their activity fluctuates 
> or
> declines. Existing memberships won't be affected.
> 
> ## Considerations:
> 
> This one-time check applies to all member applications including those
> that pay the regular £15 membership fee.
> 
> 
> # Footnotes
> 
> [1]
> https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Annual_General_Meetings/2020/Suggested_resolutions#Vote_3:_Work_on_membership_prerequisites
> [2] https://join.osmfoundation.org/active-contributor-membership/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
>