[Osmf-talk] OSMF 2025
Steve Coast
steve at stevecoast.com
Sun Oct 20 14:25:49 UTC 2024
Hi Robert
“I voted fine therefore the entire election was great” sadly isn't a logical argument.
Other people than you were sent emails denying them their vote.
In normal democratic societies this is seen as a bad thing.
Best
Steve
On Oct 20, 2024, at 8:16 AM, Robert Konieczny <robkoniec at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Steve cc All,
I don't feel that we have established anything and that the election was flawed.
We knew there would be an election. I received an email with a link. I voted. Everything worked.
If there were problems, I would have reported it. I think I would have voted in the end.
Anyone could have done that.
Best,
Robert
niedz., 20 paź 2024 o 15:54 Steve Coast <steve at stevecoast.com<mailto:steve at stevecoast.com>> napisał(a):
Hi all
We’ve apparently established as fact that the OSMF election was flawed.
Papering over this and pretending that not knowing who the members are, and further preventing them from voting is a minor issue, boggles the mind.
In this time of election scrutiny and democratic change, the only path to avoid questions of legitimacy would be for the board to resign and a new board elected.
I suggest a competent and independent third party runs a re-election process. There are many we could ask.
Best
Steve
_______________________________________________
osmf-talk mailing list
osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org<mailto:osmf-talk at openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/attachments/20241020/02113198/attachment.htm>
More information about the osmf-talk
mailing list