[OSRM-talk] json route_geometry format change? 0.3.8 -> 0.4.3
Florian Lohoff
f at zz.de
Fri Sep 12 08:16:27 UTC 2014
Hi,
is it intentional that the route_geometry json field in the response changed from
beeing an array of arrays to beeing an array of strings?
0.4.3 output:
{
"hint_data" : {
"checksum" : 3513085911,
"locations" : [
"rU4RAP_baQDmJR4AHgAAAAcAAAAAAAAAEgAAAE6DDgC0TBEDyjFnAAAASQA",
"rU4RAP_baQDmJR4ACAAAAB0AAAA2AAAAAAAAAE6DDgCwThEDpzVnAAEAAAA"
]
},
"route_summary" : {
"start_point" : "39370330|tertiary|",
"total_distance" : 89,
"total_time" : 0,
"end_point" : "39370330|tertiary|"
},
"via_points" : [
[
51.465397,
6.762954
],
[
51.465904,
6.763943
]
],
"status" : 0,
"found_alternative" : false,
"route_geometry" : [
"51.465396,6.762954",
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"51.465904,6.763943"
],
"via_indices" : [
0,
2
],
"status_message" : "Found route between points",
"route_name" : [
"",
""
]
}
Old 0.3 Version - I upgraded a production instance from 0.3.8 to 0.4.3
and it failed immediatly :)
{
"hint_data" : {
"checksum" : -1845252855,
"locations" : [
"eYg3AFq9AABQAAAANgAAANdz_4MK-eI_rodOAMxRCgC",
"gYg3AFq9AAAZAAAAFAAAAF7_ogd21-E_4YdOADBSCgD"
]
},
"via_points" : [
[
51.46542,
6.763
],
[
51.46593,
6.764
]
],
"route_summary" : {
"start_point" : "Unter den Ulmen",
"total_time" : 9,
"total_distance" : 90,
"end_point" : "Unter den Ulmen"
},
"status" : 0,
"version" : 0.3,
"transactionId" : "OSRM Routing Engine JSON Descriptor (v0.3)",
"route_geometry" : [
[
51.46542,
6.763
],
[
51.46577,
6.76368
],
[
51.46593,
6.764
]
],
"route_name" : [
"",
""
],
"status_message" : "Found route between points",
"alternative_names" : [
[
"",
""
]
],
"alternative_summaries" : [],
"alternative_instructions" : [],
"alternative_geometries" : [],
"route_instructions" : []
}
--
Florian Lohoff f at zz.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/attachments/20140912/8d1c10e9/attachment.sig>
More information about the OSRM-talk
mailing list