[OSRM-talk] Per-Direction Node Restrictions

Spencer Gardner spencergardner at gmail.com
Thu Oct 6 14:57:59 UTC 2016


Come to think of it, it would probably be simpler to just make each node
aware of the "highest" order of highway. Knowing that, it would work to
read that info for each constituent way and determine priority based on if
the way's order matches the node's order..

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Daniel Hofmann <hofmann at mapbox.com> wrote:

> This is not planned at the moment, since all the profiles know about are
> tags. All additional processing has to happen internally in the C++ code,
>  and that's exactly why priority roads / give ways / stop signs are a bit
> ugly to implement. Sorry.
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Spencer Gardner <spencergardner at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I started working on this in https://github.com/Project-OSR
>>> M/osrm-backend/pull/3009 but it won't be a quick change in the
>>> profiles, for sure.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel J H
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks. Will your changes also allow me to read the tags of other roads
>> approaching the same node? That's the important piece for my purposes. A
>> priority_road tag is likely to be unreliable in the US since it has no
>> legal status, so I need to make some assumptions about priority based on
>> the various highway tags of the incoming ways.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSRM-talk mailing list
> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/attachments/20161006/77d21ddb/attachment.html>


More information about the OSRM-talk mailing list