[OSRM-talk] Different routing than demo server

[Jose Florido]

Thanks!

But this case I sent, the route osrm without traffic is picking is way
longer and slower.

My server is taking a long detour instead of the obvious direct route demo
server is taking. It does not seem to be a real traffic data issue in this
case. It looks more like a difference in routing algorithm or in road graph
data.



On Fri, Sep 14, 2018, 11:26 AM Frédéric Rodrigo <fred.rodrigo at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> The demo server use in addition private Mapbox real-time traffic data.
>
> Frédéric.
>
>
> Le 14/09/2018 à 19:43, Jose Florido a écrit :
> > Hi!
> >
> > I just deployed your docker images on a new server and started osrm
> > backed with latest data for Louisiana from Geofabrik.
> >
> > I am finding a big difference in routing for some cases, compared to
> > the running demo server at project-osrm.org
> >
> > For example this route:
> >
> >
> http://map.project-osrm.org/?z=10&center=29.871611%2C-90.144196&loc=29.595770%2C-90.719535&loc=29.949932%2C-90.070116&hl=en&alt=0
> >
> >
> http://104.248.79.106:9966/?z=10&center=29.871611%2C-90.144196&loc=29.595770%2C-90.719535&loc=29.949932%2C-90.070116&hl=en&alt=0
> >
> > Clearly demo server does a better job routing here.
> >
> > I am running the docker images right out of the box. MLD algo and
> > processing data with extract, partition and customize steps. I did not
> > modify the car.lua profile.
> >
> > Any idea why is there such a difference?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Jose
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OSRM-talk mailing list
> > OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/attachments/20180914/b3a825e1/attachment.html>