[OSRM-talk] New v5.23.0 release

Thu Oct 15 16:11:09 UTC 2020

IIRC you had some idea of hiding that change and unbreaking the API by
templating ResultT type. If you can explain your idea I can probably
implement it.

чт, 15 окт. 2020 г. в 17:43, Daniel Patterson via OSRM-talk <
osrm-talk at openstreetmap.org>:

> Dammit, sorry Julien, I'd forgotten about that issue - I'm not using the
> libosrm bindings directly, so this change slipped my mind.
>
> If someone has time to fix the interface, we can release 5.24.0 to address
> it, and mark 5.23.0 as a dud.  The interface change clearly breaks semver
> rules as it's not backward compatible.  The alternative would be to release
> OSRM 6.0.0, but this feels like much too small a change to justify doing
> that.
>
> While I managed to find time to work through the release process, I do not
> have time to do any significant refactoring work :-/
>
> daniel
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:38 AM Julien Coupey <osm at coupey.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel and all
>>
>> Thanks for your work on this release, and all the various recent
>> contributions that made it possible. It's great to see a new OSRM
>> version, first one in a long time!
>>
>> I'd like to ask for a clarification though, if possible, on the status
>> of libosrm regarding this new version and possible future ones. There
>> are a couple of reports about the API breaking changes ([1] and [2]). It
>> means that projects relying on libosrm v5.* no longer compile with
>> v5.22, and now v5.23. This is a major problem for downstream users and
>> maintainers, especially since the OSRM release process has long been
>> adhering to the semver scheme. I only see two ways out:
>>
>> 1. The new v5.23 release somehow endorses the API change (after all a
>> fix now would also be a new change from the last two releases). In which
>> case downstream users will have to fiddle with adjustments based on
>> libosrm minor version.
>>
>> 2. This is considered as something that must be fixed at some point in
>> the future. Then no action is required downstream, except stating that
>> current libosrm versions are no longer compatible until a patch or new
>> minor version is released.
>>
>> Knowing which option is the most likely would definitely help.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/5548
>> [2] https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/5741
>>
>> Regards
>> Julien
>>
>> On 14/10/2020 23:14, Daniel Patterson via OSRM-talk wrote:
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> >    Well, after a long hiatus, I've finally had time to cut a new
>> > release.  I've bundled up a bunch of the changes that have been
>> > submitted over the last couple of years, and tagged 5.23.0, and cleaned
>> > up the changelog/master branch which had been left dangling in an
>> > unclear state for a while.  Build/publish of the various binaries is
>> > underway and should be complete soon.  Here's what's changed - mostly
>> > bugfixes, but a few small features as well.
>> >
>> >    - Changes from 5.22.0
>> >      - Build:
>> >        - FIXED: pessimistic calls to std::move
>> > [#5560](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5561)
>> >      - Features:
>> >        - ADDED: new API parameter - `snapping=any|default` to allow
>> > snapping to previously unsnappable edges
>> > [#5361](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5361)
>> >        - ADDED: keepalive support to the osrm-routed HTTP server
>> > [#5518](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5518)
>> >        - ADDED: flatbuffers output format support
>> > [#5513](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5513)
>> >        - ADDED: Global 'skip_waypoints' option
>> > [#5556](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5556)
>> >        - FIXED: Install the libosrm_guidance library correctly
>> > [#5604](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5604)
>> >        - FIXED: Http Handler can now deal witch optional whitespace
>> > between header-key and -value
>> > [#5606](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/5606)
>> >      - Routing:
>> >        - CHANGED: allow routing past `barrier=arch`
>> > [#5352](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5352)
>> >        - CHANGED: default car weight was reduced to 2000 kg.
>> > [#5371](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5371)
>> >        - CHANGED: default car height was reduced to 2 meters.
>> > [#5389](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5389)
>> >        - FIXED: treat `bicycle=use_sidepath` as no access on the tagged
>> > way. [#5622](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5622)
>> >        - FIXED: fix table result when source and destination on same
>> > one-way segment.
>> > [#5828](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5828)
>> >        - FIXED: fix occasional segfault when swapping data with
>> > osrm-datastore and using `exclude=`
>> > [#5844](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5844)
>> >        - FIXED: fix crash in MLD alternative search if source or target
>> > are invalid [#5851](
>> https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5851)
>> >      - Misc:
>> >        - CHANGED: Reduce memory usage for raster source handling.
>> > [#5572](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5572)
>> >        - CHANGED: Add cmake option `ENABLE_DEBUG_LOGGING` to control
>> > whether output debug logging.
>> > [#3427](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/3427)
>> >        - CHANGED: updated extent of Hong Kong as left hand drive
>> > country. [#5535](
>> https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/5535)
>> >        - FIXED: corrected error message when failing to snap input
>> > coordinates [#5846](
>> https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5846)
>> >      - Infrastructure
>> >        - REMOVED: STXXL support removed as STXXL became abandonware.
>> > [#5760](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/5760)
>> >
>> > daniel
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OSRM-talk mailing list
>> > OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OSRM-talk mailing list
>> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OSRM-talk mailing list
> OSRM-talk at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/attachments/20201015/48923cb9/attachment-0001.htm>