[Potlatch-dev] Suggestion for "lifecycle" tag - comments?

[NopMap]

Steve Bennett-3 wrote:
> 
> Anyway think the element names could be refined slightly. Are there
> any other tags that work this way, apart from the lifecycle ones? Do
> different tags have different lifecycles (I seem to recall that
> railways have more states). Should I just hard-code it all?
> 

I like the basic mechanism, supports the current handling of construction
nicely.

I believe a tagging scheme like this was discussed for the very unspecific
historic=ruins, but I dont't think there was anything definite.

bye
               Nop

-- 
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Potlatch-dev-Suggestion-for-lifecycle-tag-comments-tp6029585p6030992.html
Sent from the Potlatch mailing list archive at Nabble.com.