[openstreetmap-website] Obtain changeset comment for /api/[node|way|relation](/history) (#584)

[Paul Norman]

How do existing editors handle the change to the XML? 

Are attributes or additional XML nodes below the object a better way to handle it?

Would this be a better way of representing the information as it conveys all changeset tags?

```xml
<node ...>
<cs-tag k=... v=.../>
</node>
```

I know I ran into issues with snapshot-server and non-standard attributes on the XML causing clients to reject the XML, so a change like this needs testing to see what it will break.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/584#issuecomment-29583553
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20131201/afec2e8a/attachment.html>