[openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website] Update to iD v2.13.0 (#2122)

[Simon Poole]

> 
> 
> Could you elaborate @simonpoole?

See

> Add MapRules service and parameters to use it (#5617, thanks @maxgrossman)

To expand a bit, by providing a platform for third party services:

- we are providing a high marketing value to the companies involved (I don't want to speculate on the equivalent value in $)
- we are making it more difficult for alternative solutions to have a place in our offering (just look at Mapillary and OSC vs. simple photo drag & drop)
-  we are in general making it more difficult for our contributors to edit without exposing themselves to third parties, which is one of the reasons a large part of your audience uses OSM in the 1st place.

I'm not against the integration of 3rd party services in general, but we need to at least have an opportunity to evaluate the situation and not just having a fait accompli dropped in front of us.

PS: and yes we (as in LWG now) will need to have a look at the data protection implications of the integration.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2122#issuecomment-456915197
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20190123/a3050e76/attachment.html>