[openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website] Microcosms microcosms (PR #3683)

[Tom Hughes]

Andy's point about the friendly ids is that the normal pattern is to include the numeric id as well, so something like `.../9999/friendly-slug` so that the routing can just ignore the text part and use the number - that also means people can change the textual name as much as they like without breaking URLs.

As to the question of organisers - what is the point of creating the table one way only to change it five minutes later? We don't need to preserve the entire development history for an unmerged feature - until a feature is merged it's fine to go back and change things. A first PR that added the complete data model and then PRs that incrementally made use of that would be a great approach for example.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/3683#issuecomment-1247396344
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/3683/c1247396344 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20220914/050c097b/attachment.htm>