[openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website] Improve Github issues by modelling issues after Microsoft Powertoys repo (Issue #4788)

[Sabih S]

Looking at the issues, just the last 20 are after 2024 months so it's not that many it seems. Being new to the repo, I do like organized issues so I can scan easier for which ones are problems. Not that impactful though it seems in this situation, as you said.

I did look up the "good first issue" label and there was just one result. Quick link to the search results here: [https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22good+first+issue%22](https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22good+first+issue%22)

The issue was not actually a good first issue according to someone in the comments. I'd be interested to take a look at the codebase if I could get a pointer to a good first issue. Hard to know where to start. 

I'm interested in joining that team of contributors. Can look around and spend a few hours a week.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/4788#issuecomment-2114018357
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/4788/2114018357 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20240515/904399d3/attachment.htm>