[openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website] Order changeset elements for consistent pagination (PR #5209)

[Tom Hughes]

Well what I mostly want in the short term is for the tests to be reliable, but the reason they're not reliable is that the web site is not reliable - next and previous may not step through the objects reliably.

As we're paginating this data with a full count of pages we're already reading it all anyway so having to sort it doesn't change much.

I don't care much what the order is so long as it's stable which I'm not sure timestamp+version is (though adding id as a third element would guarantee stability).

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5209#issuecomment-2353147993
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5209/c2353147993 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20240916/3f060970/attachment-0001.htm>