[openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website] My user experience with number of changes on a changeset list (Issue #5770)

[maro-21]

maro-21 created an issue (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5770)

The number showing the number of changes and the number showing the number of comments look almost the same and are hard to read and distinguish because they are in the same place.

![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/18348e8d-5edd-456e-96b3-1fe841494ebd)

I think it is too much information to show the number of changes in the changeset list. For people like me who have been using OSM for years, this is unreadable and it makes impossible to see which changesets have comments. What value does this information add to the Changes History? Are 20 changes a lot or a little? Why do we need so many numbers? This information could better be in the changeset itself, not in the list. And it's not there, which is strange. As a person who has been reviewing the list every day for several years, I find the number of changes irrelevant. Or more accurately: it doesn't matter on this list. Noticing the changesets that have some comments is important, but now I don't see them.

In addition, the previous font and icon showing that the changeset has some comments was larger, now it is smaller, this is a change to the downside.

Whether the changeset has a comment is now almost invisible!!!

![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83b4f434-19cd-425e-863d-ed6cad1e355c)

To sum up - reviewing changes is now more difficult and cumbersome.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5770
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5770 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20250307/1c06b66a/attachment.htm>