[openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website] Don't classify Coveralls upload server errors as failures (Issue #5670)

[Tom Hughes]

tomhughes left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5670)

> I've been thinking about if more granular control about which errors get reported in which way could help. (maybe issue at [coverallsapp/github-action](https://github.com/coverallsapp/github-action)?)

I was just looking at what's possible and the action has a `fail-on-error` setting but that basically makes pretty much any sort of error not an error though it's far from clear to me what errors you would want to exclude to cover the cases @gravitystorm seems to be worried about. Can you ever distinguish between an HTTP error that means the API is down and one that means it rejected your data because it was the wrong format? At least without intimate knowledge of the server side...

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5670#issuecomment-2764575427
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5670/2764575427 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20250330/b4e0444b/attachment.htm>