[openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website] A new foundation for user notifications (PR #6837)

[Pablo Brasero]

pablobm left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6837)

That sounds reasonable to me. I'm always wondering what's a good way to present these types of changes. I tend to have those commits that do just the generation (as you have seen) in order to clarify the provenance of the code. However this can be done too in code comments and commit descriptions, which I have done now.

While at it, I have added a couple of methods, `Changeset#visible_subscribers` and `ChangesetComment#notifiable_subscribers` in order to reduce the number of indirections in the `recipients` section of `ChangesetCommentNotifier`.

Finally, I have updated Noticed to v3.0.0. Can't remember why it was 2.9.3, I guess I started this experiment before it was published? In any case, the changes between the two versions are not significant: https://github.com/excid3/noticed/compare/v2.9.3...v3.0.0

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6837#issuecomment-4082097177
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6837/c4082097177 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rails-dev/attachments/20260318/0180b736/attachment.htm>